# kaal:claim:1664809-031

**Claim.** Regardless of the relative merits of securities regulation in the United States and Europe, European investors are most likely to benefit if Europe addresses the problem of investor protection itself rather than through US courts.

**Type.** normative  **Support.** argued

**Holds when.**

- choice between European reform and access to US litigation

**Source quote.**

> European investors are most likely to benefit if Europe addresses

**From.** Richard W. Painter, Wulf A. Kaal, *Extraterritorial Application of US Securities Law – Will the US Become the Default Jurisdiction for* (2010), 4.6. European Investors, page 7

**Cite as.** Richard W. Painter, Wulf A. Kaal, Extraterritorial Application of US Securities Law – Will the US Become the Default Jurisdiction for (2010). SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1664809

**Verify.** sha256 of source PDF `2d5c8c30f969f8eb613bfa1fe6888a7cfa1a452e1027bcda0489618ceac62c20` at https://raw.githubusercontent.com/wulfkaal/Academic-Papers/main/papers/pdf/Painter%20and%20Kaal%20-%202010%20-%20Extraterritorial%20Application%20of%20US%20Securities%20Law%20%E2%80%93%20Will%20the%20US%20Become%20the%20Default%20Jurisdiction%20for.pdf

**Topics.** securities-law

**Keywords.** investor-protection, european-regulation, self-help, securities-fraud, policy

**Related claims.**

- supported_by: https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/2029983-040

**Canonical form.** This markdown file is the canonical hashed representation of the claim. Its sha256 is the content hash used for attestation.