# kaal:claim:1664809-033

**Claim.** Overlapping regulation must be distinguished from conflicting regulation: only conflicting regulation could violate international law, because the territorial integrity of a state is breached only where there is a specific true conflict in the substantive legal norms of the respective states.

**Type.** definitional  **Support.** argued

**Holds when.**

- analysis of extraterritorial jurisdiction under public international law

**Source quote.**

> It is important to distinguish 'overlapping' from 'conflicting' regulation. Conflicting regulation could violate international law.

**From.** Richard W. Painter, Wulf A. Kaal, *Extraterritorial Application of US Securities Law – Will the US Become the Default Jurisdiction for* (2010), 4.2. Overlapping Regulation, page 5

**Cite as.** Richard W. Painter, Wulf A. Kaal, Extraterritorial Application of US Securities Law – Will the US Become the Default Jurisdiction for (2010). SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1664809

**Verify.** sha256 of source PDF `2d5c8c30f969f8eb613bfa1fe6888a7cfa1a452e1027bcda0489618ceac62c20` at https://raw.githubusercontent.com/wulfkaal/Academic-Papers/main/papers/pdf/Painter%20and%20Kaal%20-%202010%20-%20Extraterritorial%20Application%20of%20US%20Securities%20Law%20%E2%80%93%20Will%20the%20US%20Become%20the%20Default%20Jurisdiction%20for.pdf

**Topics.** institutional-design

**Keywords.** international-law, true-conflict, overlapping-regulation, territorial-integrity, extraterritoriality

**Canonical form.** This markdown file is the canonical hashed representation of the claim. Its sha256 is the content hash used for attestation.