# kaal:claim:1765901-008

**Claim.** Permitting Section 10(b) suits over dually listed securities traded outside the United States would undermine Morrison's own policy rationale, because it would interfere with the laws of other countries and turn the United States into a haven for plaintiffs' lawyers suing over foreign exchange purchases.

**Type.** failure  **Support.** argued

**Holds when.**

- dually listed securities
- purchases on foreign exchanges

**Source quote.**

> Furthermore, allowing Section 10(b) suits over dually listed securities traded outside the United States would undermine the strongest policy arguments discussed in the Morrison opinion -that applying Section 10(b) to foreign exchanges would interfere with the laws of other countries

**From.** Kaal and Painter, *The Aftermath of Morrison v. National Australia Bank and Elliott Associates v. Porsche* (2011), II. Open Questions After Morrison; 1. Does Section 10(b) Apply to Dually Listed Securities?, page 6

**Cite as.** Kaal and Painter, The Aftermath of Morrison v. National Australia Bank and Elliott Associates v. Porsche (2011). SSRN: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1765901

**Verify.** sha256 of source PDF `7b08b8a15f7d72b4eeed41be2d17c20428cb4727269077a6575c5d22e31ecdc5` at https://raw.githubusercontent.com/wulfkaal/Academic-Papers/main/papers/pdf/Kaal%20and%20Painter%20-%202011%20-%20The%20Aftermath%20of%20Morrison%20v.%20National%20Australia%20Bank%20and%20Elliott%20Associates%20v.%20Porsche.pdf

**Failure mode.** plaintiff-haven-effect  (family: other)

**Topics.** securities-law

**Keywords.** forum-shopping, comity, dual-listing, securities-class-actions

**Related claims.**

- specializes: https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/1664809-004

**Canonical form.** This markdown file is the canonical hashed representation of the claim. Its sha256 is the content hash used for attestation.