# kaal:claim:1765901-020

**Claim.** If Section 10(b) were held to reach swap agreements based on stocks traded outside the United States, plaintiffs' attorneys would use that holding as precedent to limit Morrison broadly, and other courts might create a general exception for U.S. derivative contracts referencing non-U.S. securities.

**Type.** predictive  **Support.** argued

**Holds when.**

- appellate reversal of the Porsche dismissal
- U.S. derivative contracts referencing foreign securities

**Source quote.**

> If Section 10(b) is held to apply to cases involving swap agreements based on stocks traded outside the U.S., plaintiffs' attorneys would be encouraged to use such a holding in Porsche as precedent to limit the application of Morrison in a wide range of contexts.

**From.** Kaal and Painter, *The Aftermath of Morrison v. National Australia Bank and Elliott Associates v. Porsche* (2011), II. Open Questions After Morrison; 2. Does Section 10(b) Apply to Derivative Transactions in the U.S. that Are Based on Foreign Traded Stocks?, page 11

**Cite as.** Kaal and Painter, The Aftermath of Morrison v. National Australia Bank and Elliott Associates v. Porsche (2011). SSRN: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1765901

**Verify.** sha256 of source PDF `7b08b8a15f7d72b4eeed41be2d17c20428cb4727269077a6575c5d22e31ecdc5` at https://raw.githubusercontent.com/wulfkaal/Academic-Papers/main/papers/pdf/Kaal%20and%20Painter%20-%202011%20-%20The%20Aftermath%20of%20Morrison%20v.%20National%20Australia%20Bank%20and%20Elliott%20Associates%20v.%20Porsche.pdf

**Failure mode.** derivatives-exception-to-morrison  (family: other)

**Topics.** law-and-legal-systems, securities-law

**Keywords.** derivatives, precedent, morrison-exceptions, securities-litigation

**Canonical form.** This markdown file is the canonical hashed representation of the claim. Its sha256 is the content hash used for attestation.