# kaal:claim:1765901-029

**Claim.** Expanded SEC enforcement under the Dodd-Frank provision runs a serious risk of being perceived as an encroachment on the corporate governance of foreign companies.

**Type.** predictive  **Support.** argued

**Holds when.**

- expanded extraterritorial enforcement by the SEC or DOJ

**Source quote.**

> There is serious risk that such SEC enforcement actions would be perceived to encroach upon the corporate governance of foreign companies

**From.** Kaal and Painter, *The Aftermath of Morrison v. National Australia Bank and Elliott Associates v. Porsche* (2011), III. The Dodd-Frank Act; 2. Was Section 929P(b) Necessary?, page 21

**Cite as.** Kaal and Painter, The Aftermath of Morrison v. National Australia Bank and Elliott Associates v. Porsche (2011). SSRN: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1765901

**Verify.** sha256 of source PDF `7b08b8a15f7d72b4eeed41be2d17c20428cb4727269077a6575c5d22e31ecdc5` at https://raw.githubusercontent.com/wulfkaal/Academic-Papers/main/papers/pdf/Kaal%20and%20Painter%20-%202011%20-%20The%20Aftermath%20of%20Morrison%20v.%20National%20Australia%20Bank%20and%20Elliott%20Associates%20v.%20Porsche.pdf

**Failure mode.** perceived-governance-encroachment  (family: other)

**Topics.** governance-design, corporate-governance, securities-law, compliance

**Keywords.** corporate-governance, sec-enforcement, foreign-relations, extraterritoriality

**Canonical form.** This markdown file is the canonical hashed representation of the claim. Its sha256 is the content hash used for attestation.