# kaal:claim:1765901-030

**Claim.** Overuse of the Dodd-Frank extraterritorial enforcement provision by the SEC or the DOJ could deter foreign companies from having U.S. operations.

**Type.** predictive  **Support.** argued

**Holds when.**

- frequent extraterritorial enforcement under Section 929P(b)

**Source quote.**

> Overuse of this provision by the SEC or DOJ could deter foreign companies from having U.S. operations.

**From.** Kaal and Painter, *The Aftermath of Morrison v. National Australia Bank and Elliott Associates v. Porsche* (2011), III. The Dodd-Frank Act; 2. Was Section 929P(b) Necessary?, page 21

**Cite as.** Kaal and Painter, The Aftermath of Morrison v. National Australia Bank and Elliott Associates v. Porsche (2011). SSRN: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1765901

**Verify.** sha256 of source PDF `7b08b8a15f7d72b4eeed41be2d17c20428cb4727269077a6575c5d22e31ecdc5` at https://raw.githubusercontent.com/wulfkaal/Academic-Papers/main/papers/pdf/Kaal%20and%20Painter%20-%202011%20-%20The%20Aftermath%20of%20Morrison%20v.%20National%20Australia%20Bank%20and%20Elliott%20Associates%20v.%20Porsche.pdf

**Failure mode.** foreign-operations-deterrence  (family: other)

**Topics.** securities-law, compliance

**Keywords.** sec-enforcement, foreign-direct-investment, deterrence, dodd-frank

**Canonical form.** This markdown file is the canonical hashed representation of the claim. Its sha256 is the content hash used for attestation.