# kaal:claim:1806252-017

**Claim.** The SEC would be better advised to interpret the rulemaking authority it received from Congress than to increase requirements on hedge funds in order to address concerns over potential systemic risk.

**Type.** normative  **Support.** argued

**Holds when.**

- indicia suggest hedge funds may not pose systemic risk

**Source quote.**

> Perhaps the SEC would be well advised to interpret the authority it received from Congress rather than to increase the requirements on hedge funds to address concerns over potential systemic risk.

**From.** Kaal, *Hedge Fund Regulation Via Basel III* (2011), III.2.c.2 SEC's Rulemaking Authority, page 41

**Cite as.** Kaal, Hedge Fund Regulation Via Basel III (2011). SSRN: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1806252

**Verify.** sha256 of source PDF `3343ebfe05a925c3d1a75625c4b351ccff515c50819a48d155804daacf01429d` at https://raw.githubusercontent.com/wulfkaal/Academic-Papers/main/papers/pdf/Kaal%20-%202011%20-%20Hedge%20Fund%20Regulation%20Via%20Basel%20III.pdf

**Topics.** securities-law, dynamic-regulation, systemic-risk, risk-and-incentives, private-funds

**Keywords.** sec, rulemaking, systemic-risk, hedge-fund-regulation

**Canonical form.** This markdown file is the canonical hashed representation of the claim. Its sha256 is the content hash used for attestation.