# kaal:claim:1908473-006

**Claim.** The second trigger, which increases voting rights before resolution, should fire on evidence that conversion into equity was unsuccessful, that conversion came too early or too late, or that the firm's financial performance keeps trending downward.

**Type.** design  **Support.** argued

**Holds when.**

- Applies after the first trigger has already converted debt into equity
- Applies before authorities initiate resolution

**Source quote.**

> Increasing the voting rights pre-resolution could be triggered by evidence that the conversion into equity was not successful, that conversion was triggered too early or too late, or that there is an overall continuing downward trend in the financial performance of the company.

**From.** Wulf A. Kaal, Christoph Henkel, *Contingent Capital with Sequential Triggers* (2011), I. INTRODUCTION, page 12

**Cite as.** Wulf A. Kaal, Christoph Henkel, Contingent Capital with Sequential Triggers (2011). SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1908473

**Verify.** sha256 of source PDF `9d578dac663357529edd1f6453fcfe69bdc59ac882408d9edfde5a4c2916befa` at https://raw.githubusercontent.com/wulfkaal/Academic-Papers/main/papers/pdf/Kaal%20and%20Henkel%20-%202011%20-%20Contingent%20Capital%20with%20Sequential%20Triggers.pdf

**Topics.** contingent-capital, governance-design, systemic-risk

**Keywords.** sequential-triggers, voting-rights, trigger-design, bank-resolution

**Related claims.**

- extended_by: https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/2061166-034
- extended_by: https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/1998455-032

**Canonical form.** This markdown file is the canonical hashed representation of the claim. Its sha256 is the content hash used for attestation.