# kaal:claim:1908473-030

**Claim.** The second trigger voting rights increase should never actually be triggered; its function is to level the playing field between constituents, incentivize negotiation, and provide an alternative to reorganization.

**Type.** normative  **Support.** argued

**Source quote.**

> The second trigger voting rights increase should never actually be triggered. Rather, it should help level the playing field between constituents and incentivize negotiation and provide an alternative to reorganization.

**From.** Wulf A. Kaal, Christoph Henkel, *Contingent Capital with Sequential Triggers* (2011), IV.B.2.b. U.S. Law, page 44

**Cite as.** Wulf A. Kaal, Christoph Henkel, Contingent Capital with Sequential Triggers (2011). SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1908473

**Verify.** sha256 of source PDF `9d578dac663357529edd1f6453fcfe69bdc59ac882408d9edfde5a4c2916befa` at https://raw.githubusercontent.com/wulfkaal/Academic-Papers/main/papers/pdf/Kaal%20and%20Henkel%20-%202011%20-%20Contingent%20Capital%20with%20Sequential%20Triggers.pdf

**Topics.** governance-design, contingent-capital

**Keywords.** voting-rights, deterrence, negotiation, sequential-triggers

**Related claims.**

- extended_by: https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/2061166-034

**Canonical form.** This markdown file is the canonical hashed representation of the claim. Its sha256 is the content hash used for attestation.