# kaal:claim:2029983-011

**Claim.** Jurisdictional competition in global securities litigation after Morrison will be bifurcated, because some jurisdictions recognize private rights of action while others do not, and some, including the United States, extend government enforcement extraterritorially where private suits are barred.

**Type.** mechanism  **Support.** argued

**Holds when.**

- post-Morrison global securities litigation

**Source quote.**

> Bifurcated jurisdictional competition will characterize global securities litigation after Morrison because some juris- dictions recognize private rights of action whereas others do not,

**From.** Wulf A. Kaal, Richard W. Painter, *Forum Competition and Choice of Law Competition in Securities Law after Morrison v. National Austral* (2012), I.C. Bifurcated Jurisdictional Competition in Securities Law, page 20

**Cite as.** Wulf A. Kaal, Richard W. Painter, Forum Competition and Choice of Law Competition in Securities Law after Morrison v. National Austral (2012). SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2029983

**Verify.** sha256 of source PDF `fde2ff611420eb283cbb49a6b681a2ae8efa2b4603ae71480e2d91483f0295f2` at https://raw.githubusercontent.com/wulfkaal/Academic-Papers/main/papers/pdf/Kaal%20and%20Painter%20-%202012%20-%20Forum%20Competition%20and%20Choice%20of%20Law%20Competition%20in%20Securities%20Law%20after%20Morrison%20v.%20National%20Austral.pdf

**Topics.** compliance, economics, law-and-legal-systems

**Keywords.** bifurcation, private-rights-of-action, government-enforcement, dodd-frank-929p, jurisdictional-competition

**Canonical form.** This markdown file is the canonical hashed representation of the claim. Its sha256 is the content hash used for attestation.