{
 "@context": "https://schema.org",
 "@type": "Claim",
 "@id": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/2029983-014",
 "identifier": "kaal:claim:2029983-014",
 "text": "Government enforcement acts as a backstop that makes the case for choice of law freedom stronger: allowing parties to choose their legal regime is more defensible when bad choices, such as moving transactions to regimes with little regulation, do not thwart government enforcement.",
 "author": {
  "@type": "Person",
  "name": "Wulf A. Kaal",
  "identifier": "https://orcid.org/0009-0008-7840-1847"
 },
 "citation": "Wulf A. Kaal, Richard W. Painter, Forum Competition and Choice of Law Competition in Securities Law after Morrison v. National Austral (2012). SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2029983",
 "isBasedOn": {
  "@type": "ScholarlyArticle",
  "name": "Forum Competition and Choice of Law Competition in Securities Law after Morrison v. National Austral",
  "datePublished": "2012",
  "url": "https://ssrn.com/abstract=2029983",
  "sha256": "fde2ff611420eb283cbb49a6b681a2ae8efa2b4603ae71480e2d91483f0295f2",
  "encoding": "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/wulfkaal/Academic-Papers/main/papers/pdf/Kaal%20and%20Painter%20-%202012%20-%20Forum%20Competition%20and%20Choice%20of%20Law%20Competition%20in%20Securities%20Law%20after%20Morrison%20v.%20National%20Austral.pdf"
 },
 "keywords": [
  "law-and-legal-systems",
  "compliance"
 ],
 "about": [
  "race-to-the-bottom",
  "choice-of-law",
  "government-enforcement",
  "dodd-frank-929p"
 ],
 "abstract": "The ar- gument for allowing choice of law freedom for transacting par- ties is more persuasive when bad choices by contracting par- ties—such as moving securities transactions offshore to regimes with little or no regulation—do not thwart enforcement action by government authorities.",
 "additionalProperty": [
  {
   "@type": "PropertyValue",
   "name": "claim_type",
   "value": "mechanism"
  },
  {
   "@type": "PropertyValue",
   "name": "confidence",
   "value": "argued"
  },
  {
   "@type": "PropertyValue",
   "name": "scope_conditions",
   "value": [
    "SEC and DOJ retain extraterritorial enforcement power under Section 929P"
   ]
  },
  {
   "@type": "PropertyValue",
   "name": "is_failure_mode",
   "value": false
  },
  {
   "@type": "PropertyValue",
   "name": "attestations",
   "value": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/colloquium/attestations/373b0de9a966bfa89c31f2557d20163d60a35d81c9023f1e7e872d68cc80f91c.json"
  },
  {
   "@type": "PropertyValue",
   "name": "edges",
   "value": []
  }
 ],
 "isPartOf": {
  "@id": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/index.json"
 },
 "dateModified": "2026-07-27",
 "version": "1.0",
 "sha256": "373b0de9a966bfa89c31f2557d20163d60a35d81c9023f1e7e872d68cc80f91c",
 "canonicalForm": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/2029983-014.md"
}