# kaal:claim:2029983-019

**Claim.** The German KapMuG does not relieve trial judges of deciding the legal issues in every individual case, so it remains administratively burdensome even though its model case judgment binds the trial courts.

**Type.** failure  **Support.** argued

**Holds when.**

- German model case proceedings for capital markets claims

**Source quote.**

> The KapMuG, how- ever, does not discharge the trial judges from addressing the legal issues in each and every case individually.

**From.** Wulf A. Kaal, Richard W. Painter, *Forum Competition and Choice of Law Competition in Securities Law after Morrison v. National Austral* (2012), II.A. The Proliferation of European Collective Procedures, page 33

**Cite as.** Wulf A. Kaal, Richard W. Painter, Forum Competition and Choice of Law Competition in Securities Law after Morrison v. National Austral (2012). SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2029983

**Verify.** sha256 of source PDF `fde2ff611420eb283cbb49a6b681a2ae8efa2b4603ae71480e2d91483f0295f2` at https://raw.githubusercontent.com/wulfkaal/Academic-Papers/main/papers/pdf/Kaal%20and%20Painter%20-%202012%20-%20Forum%20Competition%20and%20Choice%20of%20Law%20Competition%20in%20Securities%20Law%20after%20Morrison%20v.%20National%20Austral.pdf

**Failure mode.** kapmug-administrative-burden  (family: supervisory-capacity-gap)

**Topics.** institutional-design

**Keywords.** kapmug, germany, collective-procedures, judicial-administration

**Canonical form.** This markdown file is the canonical hashed representation of the claim. Its sha256 is the content hash used for attestation.