# kaal:claim:2150377-027

**Claim.** The Form PF quarterly reporting threshold of $1.5 billion in assets under management is not a binding sizing constraint for most advisers: 80.46% would not take it into account in determining fund size, while 19.54% would.

**Type.** empirical  **Support.** evidenced

**Holds when.**

- respondents to survey Question 10
- measured shortly after the registration effective date

**Source quote.**

> Of those who responded, 80.46% would not take the Form PF threshold for quarterly reporting of $1.5 billion AUM into account in determining the appropriate size of AUM for the fund(s) they manage, whereas 19.54% would take it into account.

**From.** Wulf A. Kaal, *Hedge Fund Manager Registration Under the Dodd-Frank Act* (2012), D. Assets Under Management

**Cite as.** Wulf A. Kaal, Hedge Fund Manager Registration Under the Dodd-Frank Act (2012). SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2150377

**Verify.** sha256 of source PDF `0b58bb409cac7674d78515f5374096f9a349de3bbd1983c990e0edc85a635a09` at https://raw.githubusercontent.com/wulfkaal/Academic-Papers/main/papers/pdf/Kaal%20-%202012%20-%20Hedge%20Fund%20Manager%20Registration%20Under%20the%20Dodd-Frank%20Act.pdf

**Topics.** private-funds, disclosure, empirical-evidence

**Keywords.** form-pf, reporting-threshold, assets-under-management, survey-results, fund-size

**Related claims.**

- extended_by: https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/2739479-030
- contested_by: https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/2739479-031

**Canonical form.** This markdown file is the canonical hashed representation of the claim. Its sha256 is the content hash used for attestation.