# kaal:claim:2267560-021

**Claim.** Opportunities for integrating dynamic elements into the rulemaking process include intra-jurisdictional feedback processes, feedback effects between private and public rulemakers, inter-jurisdictional feedback processes, informal rules, and organizational culture.

**Type.** design  **Support.** asserted

**Source quote.**

> (i) intra-jurisdictional feedback processes such as (i) exchanges and synergies between public rulemakers and regulators, (ii) feedback effects between private and public rulemakers, (iii) inter-jurisdictional feedback processes, (iv) informal rules, and (v) organizational culture.

**From.** Wulf A. Kaal, *Evolution of Law Dynamic Regulation in a New Institutional Economics Framework* (2013), III. Rulemaking in a Dynamic Framework, page 8

**Cite as.** Wulf A. Kaal, Evolution of Law Dynamic Regulation in a New Institutional Economics Framework (2013). SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2267560

**Verify.** sha256 of source PDF `7ecc9dd1826121a95bf252476cdaa1c8737ad8079e12caf66c4342ffae7af8af` at https://raw.githubusercontent.com/wulfkaal/Academic-Papers/main/papers/pdf/Kaal%20-%202013%20-%20Evolution%20of%20Law%20Dynamic%20Regulation%20in%20a%20New%20Institutional%20Economics%20Framework.pdf

**Topics.** dynamic-regulation, institutional-design

**Keywords.** dynamic-regulation, feedback-effects, informal-rules, organizational-culture

**Related claims.**

- restated_by: https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/5886442-030
- restated_by: https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/2957645-010

**Canonical form.** This markdown file is the canonical hashed representation of the claim. Its sha256 is the content hash used for attestation.