# kaal:claim:2273857-009

**Claim.** Rulemakers discount or willingly accept unknown future contingencies and the inevitable need for later revision, amendment, and retraction, because they are pursuing certainty and predictability in the rules they enact.

**Type.** mechanism  **Support.** argued

**Holds when.**

- rulemakers prioritize certainty and predictability

**Source quote.**

> To attain certainty and increase predictability, rulemakers discount or often willingly accept unknown future contingencies and the inevitable need for rule revision, amendments, and retractions.

**From.** Wulf A. Kaal, *Dynamic Regulation of the Financial Services Industry* (2013), I. Introduction, page 10

**Cite as.** Wulf A. Kaal, Dynamic Regulation of the Financial Services Industry (2013). SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2273857

**Verify.** sha256 of source PDF `e7cb3dea40593135acc99a9b00690138fe01020514ebf388f5140e1b0e59e82a` at https://raw.githubusercontent.com/wulfkaal/Academic-Papers/main/papers/pdf/Kaal%20-%202013%20-%20Dynamic%20Regulation%20of%20the%20Financial%20Services%20Industry.pdf

**Topics.** dynamic-regulation, law-and-legal-systems

**Keywords.** rulemaking, legal-certainty, future-contingencies, rule-revision

**Related claims.**

- extended_by: https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/2831040-006

**Canonical form.** This markdown file is the canonical hashed representation of the claim. Its sha256 is the content hash used for attestation.