# kaal:claim:2273857-046

**Claim.** Regulatory cycles would benefit from supplementing, rather than replacing, the existing regulatory framework with dynamic elements.

**Type.** normative  **Support.** argued

**Holds when.**

- dynamic elements operate as a supplement to stable rules

**Source quote.**

> The author identifies common elements of regulatory crises and suggests normatively that regulatory cycles could benefit from supplementing the existing regulatory framework with dynamic elements.

**From.** Wulf A. Kaal, *Dynamic Regulation of the Financial Services Industry* (2013), III. Dynamic Regulation of the Financial Services Industry, page 23

**Cite as.** Wulf A. Kaal, Dynamic Regulation of the Financial Services Industry (2013). SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2273857

**Verify.** sha256 of source PDF `e7cb3dea40593135acc99a9b00690138fe01020514ebf388f5140e1b0e59e82a` at https://raw.githubusercontent.com/wulfkaal/Academic-Papers/main/papers/pdf/Kaal%20-%202013%20-%20Dynamic%20Regulation%20of%20the%20Financial%20Services%20Industry.pdf

**Topics.** dynamic-regulation

**Keywords.** dynamic-regulation, regulatory-cycles, normative-claim, regulatory-design

**Related claims.**

- restated_by: https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/kaal-2014-dynamicregulationviagove-018
- restated_by: https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/2831040-014

**Canonical form.** This markdown file is the canonical hashed representation of the claim. Its sha256 is the content hash used for attestation.