# kaal:claim:2317580-003

**Claim.** The decades long academic debate over improving fiduciary duty doctrine has overlooked Corporate Integrity Agreements entirely, even though the debate is otherwise framed as a choice between expanding and curtailing the doctrine.

**Type.** empirical  **Support.** asserted

**Source quote.**

> The academic debate on options for improvement of the fiduciary duty doctrine has ignored the possible role of Corporate Integrity Agreements (CIAs).

**From.** Wulf A. Kaal, Elizabeth R. Malay, *The Role of Corporate Integrity Agreements in the Expansion of Fiduciary Duties* (2013), I. Introduction, page 6

**Cite as.** Wulf A. Kaal, Elizabeth R. Malay, The Role of Corporate Integrity Agreements in the Expansion of Fiduciary Duties (2013). SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2317580

**Verify.** sha256 of source PDF `50973e1e820aef47a4e7ffdbdcb513d03f1845643fcf4fa5910e9528a0b7dac2` at https://raw.githubusercontent.com/wulfkaal/Academic-Papers/main/papers/pdf/Kaal%20and%20Malay%20-%202013%20-%20The%20Role%20of%20Corporate%20Integrity%20Agreements%20in%20the%20Expansion%20of%20Fiduciary%20Duties.pdf

**Topics.** compliance, corporate-governance

**Keywords.** corporate-integrity-agreements, fiduciary-duties, literature-gap

**Canonical form.** This markdown file is the canonical hashed representation of the claim. Its sha256 is the content hash used for attestation.