# kaal:claim:2317580-015

**Claim.** CIAs often become the benchmark for expected conduct in a subsequent civil or criminal trial, which distinguishes them from ordinary contractual arrangements between companies and the government.

**Type.** mechanism  **Support.** evidenced

**Holds when.**

- litigation following execution of a CIA

**Source quote.**

> CIAs often become the standard for expected conduct in a civil or criminal trial.

**From.** Wulf A. Kaal, Elizabeth R. Malay, *The Role of Corporate Integrity Agreements in the Expansion of Fiduciary Duties* (2013), III.2 Characteristics, page 11

**Cite as.** Wulf A. Kaal, Elizabeth R. Malay, The Role of Corporate Integrity Agreements in the Expansion of Fiduciary Duties (2013). SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2317580

**Verify.** sha256 of source PDF `50973e1e820aef47a4e7ffdbdcb513d03f1845643fcf4fa5910e9528a0b7dac2` at https://raw.githubusercontent.com/wulfkaal/Academic-Papers/main/papers/pdf/Kaal%20and%20Malay%20-%202013%20-%20The%20Role%20of%20Corporate%20Integrity%20Agreements%20in%20the%20Expansion%20of%20Fiduciary%20Duties.pdf

**Topics.** law-and-legal-systems, compliance

**Keywords.** standard-of-conduct, litigation, corporate-integrity-agreements

**Canonical form.** This markdown file is the canonical hashed representation of the claim. Its sha256 is the content hash used for attestation.