# kaal:claim:2317580-028

**Claim.** Because CIAs mandate a chief compliance officer and dictate how that officer interacts with the board, they increase the board's knowledge and monitoring of compliance, and a board possessing such knowledge should play a bigger role in ensuring that the company meets federal and state standards.

**Type.** mechanism  **Support.** argued

**Holds when.**

- CIAs that mandate a CCO and prescribe CCO to board reporting

**Source quote.**

> More specifically, because CIAs often mandate a CCO and dictate how the CCO interacts with the board, CIAs can increase boards' knowledge and monitoring of the company's compliance.

**From.** Wulf A. Kaal, Elizabeth R. Malay, *The Role of Corporate Integrity Agreements in the Expansion of Fiduciary Duties* (2013), IV.1 Contractual Addendum to Increase Duties, page 15

**Cite as.** Wulf A. Kaal, Elizabeth R. Malay, The Role of Corporate Integrity Agreements in the Expansion of Fiduciary Duties (2013). SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2317580

**Verify.** sha256 of source PDF `50973e1e820aef47a4e7ffdbdcb513d03f1845643fcf4fa5910e9528a0b7dac2` at https://raw.githubusercontent.com/wulfkaal/Academic-Papers/main/papers/pdf/Kaal%20and%20Malay%20-%202013%20-%20The%20Role%20of%20Corporate%20Integrity%20Agreements%20in%20the%20Expansion%20of%20Fiduciary%20Duties.pdf

**Topics.** compliance, corporate-governance, citation-and-knowledge

**Keywords.** information-flow, chief-compliance-officer, board-knowledge, duty-of-care

**Canonical form.** This markdown file is the canonical hashed representation of the claim. Its sha256 is the content hash used for attestation.
