# kaal:claim:2317580-031

**Claim.** Courts treat companies that executed a CIA differently from other companies, and are increasingly recognizing the role of CIAs and their implications for directors' fiduciary duties.

**Type.** empirical  **Support.** evidenced

**Holds when.**

- derivative litigation involving companies operating under a CIA

**Source quote.**

> Courts, however, treat companies that executed a CIA differently. Courts are increasingly recognizing the role of CIAs and their implications for directors' fiduciary duties.

**From.** Wulf A. Kaal, Elizabeth R. Malay, *The Role of Corporate Integrity Agreements in the Expansion of Fiduciary Duties* (2013), IV.2 Delineating the Role of CIAs in Fiduciary Duties, page 16

**Cite as.** Wulf A. Kaal, Elizabeth R. Malay, The Role of Corporate Integrity Agreements in the Expansion of Fiduciary Duties (2013). SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2317580

**Verify.** sha256 of source PDF `50973e1e820aef47a4e7ffdbdcb513d03f1845643fcf4fa5910e9528a0b7dac2` at https://raw.githubusercontent.com/wulfkaal/Academic-Papers/main/papers/pdf/Kaal%20and%20Malay%20-%202013%20-%20The%20Role%20of%20Corporate%20Integrity%20Agreements%20in%20the%20Expansion%20of%20Fiduciary%20Duties.pdf

**Topics.** compliance, corporate-governance

**Keywords.** judicial-treatment, corporate-integrity-agreements, fiduciary-duties, derivative-suits

**Related claims.**

- extended_by: https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/kaal-2013-acomparativeperspectiveo-036

**Canonical form.** This markdown file is the canonical hashed representation of the claim. Its sha256 is the content hash used for attestation.