# kaal:claim:2348463-032

**Claim.** Restricting Form PF data to the eyes of the bankruptcy judge alone would create problems in the litigation process, because opposing parties may demand access to the same information.

**Type.** failure  **Support.** argued

**Holds when.**

- judge-only access design

**Source quote.**

> However, making creditors' Form PF data available for the eyes of the judge only could raise issues in the litigation process because parties may demand access to the same information.

**From.** Wulf A. Kaal, *Hedge Funds’ Systemic Risk Disclosures in Bankruptcy* (2013), IV. SYSTEMIC RISK DISCLOSURES IN BANKRUPTCY, page 32

**Cite as.** Wulf A. Kaal, Hedge Funds’ Systemic Risk Disclosures in Bankruptcy (2013). SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2348463

**Verify.** sha256 of source PDF `b3682f24c0b277b3307fb9f54cd17a4e0a87b48eecba34b40e189212f20c9a22` at https://raw.githubusercontent.com/wulfkaal/Academic-Papers/main/papers/pdf/Kaal%20-%202013%20-%20Hedge%20Funds%E2%80%99%20Systemic%20Risk%20Disclosures%20in%20Bankruptcy.pdf

**Failure mode.** judge only access invites access demands  (family: disclosure-cost-and-burden)

**Topics.** law-and-legal-systems, disclosure

**Keywords.** judicial-access, due-process, litigation, disclosure-design

**Canonical form.** This markdown file is the canonical hashed representation of the claim. Its sha256 is the content hash used for attestation.