# kaal:claim:2389416-034

**Claim.** The difference-in-differences interaction term identifying treated funds in 2012 is positive and statistically significant in March, April, and May 2012.

**Type.** empirical  **Support.** evidenced

**Holds when.**

- post reform dummy interacted with the AUM above $150 million dummy

**Source quote.**

> Table 9 also shows that the dummy variable that identifies the treatment group univocally (year 2012 and AUM>150M) is positive and statistically significant in March, April and May 2012.

**From.** Wulf A. Kaal, Barbara Luppi, Sandra Paterlini, *Did the Dodd-Frank Act Impact Hedge Fund Performance* (2014), 5.3. Difference-in-Difference Design

**Cite as.** Wulf A. Kaal, Barbara Luppi, Sandra Paterlini, Did the Dodd-Frank Act Impact Hedge Fund Performance (2014). SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2389416

**Verify.** sha256 of source PDF `0e1c4615b104821577498d9655de43b9c5c3e985bb0215f56c038b8232be65c3` at https://raw.githubusercontent.com/wulfkaal/Academic-Papers/main/papers/pdf/Kaal%20et%20al.%20-%202014%20-%20Did%20the%20Dodd-Frank%20Act%20Impact%20Hedge%20Fund%20Performance.pdf

**Topics.** empirical-evidence, private-funds

**Keywords.** difference-in-differences, treatment-effect, statistical-significance, hedge-fund-returns

**Related claims.**

- extended_by: https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/2389423-030

**Canonical form.** This markdown file is the canonical hashed representation of the claim. Its sha256 is the content hash used for attestation.