# kaal:claim:2447306-023

**Claim.** Complaints about Form PF's ambiguity coexist with acceptance of its substance: the same majority that flagged ambiguity as the most pressing issue also considered their existing reporting systems adequate and agreed with the SEC's definitions and instructions.

**Type.** empirical  **Support.** evidenced

**Holds when.**

- n=52 survey respondents

**Source quote.**

> However, the majority of respondents also considered their existing reporting systems adequate for capturing the information required by the SEC and agreed with the SEC's definitions and instructions for Form PF.

**From.** Wulf A. Kaal, *Private Fund Disclosures Under the Dodd-Frank Act* (2014), Abstract, page 2

**Cite as.** Wulf A. Kaal, Private Fund Disclosures Under the Dodd-Frank Act (2014). SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2447306

**Verify.** sha256 of source PDF `0c950d73240845e78faf1c3ca0ab820fcc50556faf7ff07f7f773d0876f0be8a` at https://raw.githubusercontent.com/wulfkaal/Academic-Papers/main/papers/pdf/Kaal%20-%202014%20-%20Private%20Fund%20Disclosures%20Under%20the%20Dodd-Frank%20Act.pdf

**Topics.** private-funds, securities-law, disclosure, empirical-evidence

**Keywords.** form-pf, ambiguity, sec-definitions, reporting-systems, survey-results

**Related claims.**

- restated_by: https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/2714974-012

**Canonical form.** This markdown file is the canonical hashed representation of the claim. Its sha256 is the content hash used for attestation.