# kaal:claim:2447306-040

**Claim.** On the cost evidence collected here for both smaller and larger advisers, the industry's long standing objection that mandatory registration and disclosure would inappropriately burden investment advisers is mostly unfounded.

**Type.** empirical  **Support.** argued

**Holds when.**

- cost data from this survey
- short-run costs only

**Source quote.**

> the industry's concerns that mandatory private fund adviser registration and disclosure requirements could inappropriately burden investment advisers59 seem to be mostly unfounded.

**From.** Wulf A. Kaal, *Private Fund Disclosures Under the Dodd-Frank Act* (2014), VI. Discussion and Conclusion, 2. Policy Implications and Future Research, page 39

**Cite as.** Wulf A. Kaal, Private Fund Disclosures Under the Dodd-Frank Act (2014). SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2447306

**Verify.** sha256 of source PDF `0c950d73240845e78faf1c3ca0ab820fcc50556faf7ff07f7f773d0876f0be8a` at https://raw.githubusercontent.com/wulfkaal/Academic-Papers/main/papers/pdf/Kaal%20-%202014%20-%20Private%20Fund%20Disclosures%20Under%20the%20Dodd-Frank%20Act.pdf

**Topics.** private-funds, compliance

**Keywords.** regulatory-burden, industry-opposition, form-pf, policy-implications, compliance-cost

**Related claims.**

- restated_by: https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/2732915-017

**Canonical form.** This markdown file is the canonical hashed representation of the claim. Its sha256 is the content hash used for attestation.