# kaal:claim:2486570-021

**Claim.** The increasing execution of non and deferred prosecution agreements since 2002 has raised the overall regulatory burden borne by the corporate entities subject to them.

**Type.** empirical  **Support.** argued

**Holds when.**

- applies to entities that are subject to an N/DPA

**Source quote.**

> since 2002 the increasing execution of N/DPAs has heightened the overall regu- latory burden for corporate entities that are subject to N/DPAs.

**From.** Wulf A. Kaal, Timothy Lacine, *The Effect of Deferred and Non-Prosecution Agreements on Corporate Governance Evidence from 1993-20* (2014), VI.B. IMPLICATIONS FOR BOARDS, MANAGEMENT, AND LEGAL COUNSEL, page 54

**Cite as.** Wulf A. Kaal, Timothy Lacine, The Effect of Deferred and Non-Prosecution Agreements on Corporate Governance Evidence from 1993-20 (2014). SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2486570

**Verify.** sha256 of source PDF `8c3981c9a55d8a3fe59a01660584eebc3feb3fb9109ca65344095bebe4ae49a4` at https://raw.githubusercontent.com/wulfkaal/Academic-Papers/main/papers/pdf/Kaal%20and%20Lacine%20-%202014%20-%20The%20Effect%20of%20Deferred%20and%20Non-Prosecution%20Agreements%20on%20Corporate%20Governance%20Evidence%20from%201993-20.pdf

**Topics.** governance-design, corporate-governance, law-and-legal-systems, compliance

**Keywords.** regulatory-burden, corporate-governance, legal-counsel, deferred-prosecution

**Canonical form.** This markdown file is the canonical hashed representation of the claim. Its sha256 is the content hash used for attestation.