# kaal:claim:2486570-025

**Claim.** Because 63.47 percent of the sampled agreements were executed even after the corporation had already instituted preemptive remedial measures, the current quantity, quality, comprehensiveness, and effectiveness of those preemptive measures may be insufficient to prevent an agreement.

**Type.** failure  **Support.** argued

**Source quote.**

> execution of N/DPAs after the institution of pre- emptive remedial measures (63.47 percent of the N/DPAs in the sample), the current quantity, quality, comprehensiveness, and effectiveness of preemptive remedial measures may be insufficient.

**From.** Wulf A. Kaal, Timothy Lacine, *The Effect of Deferred and Non-Prosecution Agreements on Corporate Governance Evidence from 1993-20* (2014), VI.B. IMPLICATIONS FOR BOARDS, MANAGEMENT, AND LEGAL COUNSEL, page 56

**Cite as.** Wulf A. Kaal, Timothy Lacine, The Effect of Deferred and Non-Prosecution Agreements on Corporate Governance Evidence from 1993-20 (2014). SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2486570

**Verify.** sha256 of source PDF `8c3981c9a55d8a3fe59a01660584eebc3feb3fb9109ca65344095bebe4ae49a4` at https://raw.githubusercontent.com/wulfkaal/Academic-Papers/main/papers/pdf/Kaal%20and%20Lacine%20-%202014%20-%20The%20Effect%20of%20Deferred%20and%20Non-Prosecution%20Agreements%20on%20Corporate%20Governance%20Evidence%20from%201993-20.pdf

**Failure mode.** preemptive-remediation-insufficient  (family: board-and-oversight-failure)

**Topics.** compliance, governance-design, corporate-governance, empirical-evidence

**Keywords.** preemptive-remedial-measures, compliance-effectiveness, corporate-governance, empirical-findings

**Related claims.**

- restated_by: https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/kaal-2014-dynamicregulationviagove-027
- supported_by: https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/kaal-2014-dynamicregulationviagove-026
- restated_by: https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/kaal-2014-dynamicregulationviagove-034
- extended_by: https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/kaal-2014-dynamicregulationviagove-028

**Canonical form.** This markdown file is the canonical hashed representation of the claim. Its sha256 is the content hash used for attestation.