# kaal:claim:2486570-028

**Claim.** Regulators can learn from the preemptive remedial measures corporate wrongdoers institute, because those measures reveal where governance concerns lie in a particular industry and where regulatory action is increasingly needed.

**Type.** mechanism  **Support.** argued

**Source quote.**

> from preemptive remedial measures instituted by corporate wrongdoers because such measures highlight possible areas of governance concern in a particular in- dustry and provide insights into increased needs for regulatory actions.

**From.** Wulf A. Kaal, Timothy Lacine, *The Effect of Deferred and Non-Prosecution Agreements on Corporate Governance Evidence from 1993-20* (2014), VI.B. IMPLICATIONS FOR BOARDS, MANAGEMENT, AND LEGAL COUNSEL, page 57

**Cite as.** Wulf A. Kaal, Timothy Lacine, The Effect of Deferred and Non-Prosecution Agreements on Corporate Governance Evidence from 1993-20 (2014). SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2486570

**Verify.** sha256 of source PDF `8c3981c9a55d8a3fe59a01660584eebc3feb3fb9109ca65344095bebe4ae49a4` at https://raw.githubusercontent.com/wulfkaal/Academic-Papers/main/papers/pdf/Kaal%20and%20Lacine%20-%202014%20-%20The%20Effect%20of%20Deferred%20and%20Non-Prosecution%20Agreements%20on%20Corporate%20Governance%20Evidence%20from%201993-20.pdf

**Topics.** dynamic-regulation

**Keywords.** regulatory-learning, preemptive-remedial-measures, dynamic-regulation, industry-analysis

**Related claims.**

- extended_by: https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/kaal-2014-dynamicregulationviagove-039

**Canonical form.** This markdown file is the canonical hashed representation of the claim. Its sha256 is the content hash used for attestation.