# kaal:claim:2629451-028

**Claim.** The negative market reaction at the end of the N/DPA term is the market acknowledging that suboptimal governance practices are likely to resume once the term expires.

**Type.** mechanism  **Support.** argued

**Holds when.**

- post-expiration windows in Figures 4 and 4a

**Source quote.**

> In turn, we interpret the negative market reaction at ENDPAT in Figures 4 and 4a as the market's acknowledgment that post N/DPA term expiration suboptimal governance practices are likely to continue

**From.** Wulf A. Kaal, Timothy Lacine, *Stock Price Response to Non- and Deferred Prosecution Agreements* (2015), VI. Discussion, page 19

**Cite as.** Wulf A. Kaal, Timothy Lacine, Stock Price Response to Non- and Deferred Prosecution Agreements (2015). SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2629451

**Verify.** sha256 of source PDF `507404d641abb922ab6d8e3a0b032e35ead2befd7b88746d09d178a8fa816957` at https://raw.githubusercontent.com/wulfkaal/Academic-Papers/main/papers/pdf/Kaal%20and%20Lacine%20-%202015%20-%20Stock%20Price%20Response%20to%20Non-%20and%20Deferred%20Prosecution%20Agreements.pdf

**Failure mode.** post-term-governance-reversion  (family: enforcement-gap)

**Topics.** governance-design

**Keywords.** governance-backsliding, endpat, investor-reaction, firm-value

**Canonical form.** This markdown file is the canonical hashed representation of the claim. Its sha256 is the content hash used for attestation.
