# kaal:claim:2629451-036

**Claim.** Despite wide-ranging criticism of N/DPAs on authority, fairness, and expertise grounds, scholars agree that N/DPAs do influence corporate governance.

**Type.** empirical  **Support.** asserted

**Holds when.**

- scholarly literature on N/DPAs through 2015

**Source quote.**

> Despite the broad critique of N/DPAs, consensus exists among scholars that N/DPAs influence corporate governance (Cunningham 2014b, Kaal and Lacine 2014, Coffee 2005, Thompson 2003).

**From.** Wulf A. Kaal, Timothy Lacine, *Stock Price Response to Non- and Deferred Prosecution Agreements* (2015), I. Introduction, page 3

**Cite as.** Wulf A. Kaal, Timothy Lacine, Stock Price Response to Non- and Deferred Prosecution Agreements (2015). SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2629451

**Verify.** sha256 of source PDF `507404d641abb922ab6d8e3a0b032e35ead2befd7b88746d09d178a8fa816957` at https://raw.githubusercontent.com/wulfkaal/Academic-Papers/main/papers/pdf/Kaal%20and%20Lacine%20-%202015%20-%20Stock%20Price%20Response%20to%20Non-%20and%20Deferred%20Prosecution%20Agreements.pdf

**Topics.** consensus-and-security, citation-and-knowledge, governance-design, corporate-governance

**Keywords.** scholarly-consensus, corporate-governance, ndpa, literature

**Canonical form.** This markdown file is the canonical hashed representation of the claim. Its sha256 is the content hash used for attestation.