# kaal:claim:2714974-030

**Claim.** Proposals for indirect regulation of hedge funds through the regulation of the financial institutions that interact with them are unlikely to become legally binding.

**Type.** predictive  **Support.** asserted

**Source quote.**

> Such proposals are unlikely to become legally binding.

**From.** Kaal and Oesterle, *The History of Hedge Fund Regulation in the United States* (2016), INDIRECT HEDGE FUND REGULATION, page 24

**Cite as.** Kaal and Oesterle, The History of Hedge Fund Regulation in the United States (2016). SSRN: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2714974

**Verify.** sha256 of source PDF `7764601d3ed5bb056b58949e8411eff9dfb9855f143719062030c980c5fa801b` at https://raw.githubusercontent.com/wulfkaal/Academic-Papers/main/papers/pdf/Kaal%20and%20Oesterle%20-%202016%20-%20The%20History%20of%20Hedge%20Fund%20Regulation%20in%20the%20United%20States.pdf

**Topics.** systemic-risk, private-funds

**Keywords.** indirect-regulation, bank-regulation, policy-forecast, hedge-funds

**Related claims.**

- contested_by: https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/3405660-029

**Canonical form.** This markdown file is the canonical hashed representation of the claim. Its sha256 is the content hash used for attestation.