# kaal:claim:2715083-012

**Claim.** Hedge fund investors have almost no statutory remedy: the regime establishing a hedge fund investor's rights is severely limited, nearly to the point of nonexistence, in the United States and in the offshore jurisdictions where many hedge funds are chartered.

**Type.** failure  **Support.** argued

**Holds when.**

- United States, Cayman Islands, and British Virgin Islands

**Source quote.**

> because the statutory regime establishing a hedge fund investor's right is severely limited,23 almost to the point of non-existence

**From.** Kaal, *Confluence of Mutual and Private Funds* (2016), III. Persistent Differences and Nominal Confluence, page 9

**Cite as.** Kaal, Confluence of Mutual and Private Funds (2016). SSRN: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2715083

**Verify.** sha256 of source PDF `b5c92186260d4a8499a14f81ee24ace093b24e7740af3effcd1c526fa4fa221e` at https://raw.githubusercontent.com/wulfkaal/Academic-Papers/main/papers/pdf/Kaal%20-%202016%20-%20Confluence%20of%20Mutual%20and%20Private%20Funds.pdf

**Failure mode.** Nonexistent hedge fund investor remedy  (family: investor-protection-gap)

**Topics.** private-funds, compliance

**Keywords.** investor-protection, private-rights-of-action, hedge-funds, enforcement-gap

**Related claims.**

- supported_by: https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/2811729-016

**Canonical form.** This markdown file is the canonical hashed representation of the claim. Its sha256 is the content hash used for attestation.