# kaal:claim:2732915-030

**Claim.** A majority of respondents already took the regulatory regime into account in sizing assets under management before the Dodd-Frank Act was enacted, which implies that Dodd-Frank did not make much difference in how they run their business.

**Type.** empirical  **Support.** argued

**Holds when.**

- responses to survey question 7.b.ii
- a significant minority of 47.1 percent did not consider the regime before enactment

**Source quote.**

> It shows that a majority of respondents did in fact take the regulatory regime into account before Dodd- Frank, implying that Dodd-Frank did not make much difference in the way respondents run their business.

**From.** Wulf A. Kaal, *The Private Fund Industry Five Years after the Dodd-Frank Act – A Survey Study* (2016), IV. Results, 3. Assets Under Management, page 28

**Cite as.** Wulf A. Kaal, The Private Fund Industry Five Years after the Dodd-Frank Act – A Survey Study (2016). SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2732915

**Verify.** sha256 of source PDF `643658c02f6625bca35595696116d0ad74d681ed8579c644832ae4a88b2a8c14` at https://raw.githubusercontent.com/wulfkaal/Academic-Papers/main/papers/pdf/Kaal%20-%202016%20-%20The%20Private%20Fund%20Industry%20Five%20Years%20after%20the%20Dodd-Frank%20Act%20%E2%80%93%20A%20Survey%20Study.pdf

**Topics.** empirical-evidence

**Keywords.** assets-under-management, pre-post-comparison, regulatory-salience, survey-results

**Related claims.**

- contests: https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/2150377-025

**Canonical form.** This markdown file is the canonical hashed representation of the claim. Its sha256 is the content hash used for attestation.