# kaal:claim:2732915-032

**Claim.** A majority of adviser respondents, 66.7 percent, did not take the $1.5 billion Form PF quarterly reporting threshold into account when determining the appropriate assets under management for the funds they manage.

**Type.** empirical  **Support.** evidenced

**Holds when.**

- responses to survey question 10

**Source quote.**

> Figure 15 illustrates that the majority of adviser respondents (66.7%) did not take the $1.5 billion AUM threshold under Form PF for quarterly reporting into account in determining the appropriate size of AUM for the fund(s) they manage.

**From.** Wulf A. Kaal, *The Private Fund Industry Five Years after the Dodd-Frank Act – A Survey Study* (2016), IV. Results, 3. Assets Under Management, page 30

**Cite as.** Wulf A. Kaal, The Private Fund Industry Five Years after the Dodd-Frank Act – A Survey Study (2016). SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2732915

**Verify.** sha256 of source PDF `643658c02f6625bca35595696116d0ad74d681ed8579c644832ae4a88b2a8c14` at https://raw.githubusercontent.com/wulfkaal/Academic-Papers/main/papers/pdf/Kaal%20-%202016%20-%20The%20Private%20Fund%20Industry%20Five%20Years%20after%20the%20Dodd-Frank%20Act%20%E2%80%93%20A%20Survey%20Study.pdf

**Topics.** private-funds, disclosure

**Keywords.** form-pf, reporting-thresholds, assets-under-management, threshold-avoidance

**Related claims.**

- extended_by: https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/2739479-030

**Canonical form.** This markdown file is the canonical hashed representation of the claim. Its sha256 is the content hash used for attestation.