# kaal:claim:2740477-033

**Claim.** Dynamic regulatory supplements do not violate the procedural protections mandated by the Administrative Procedure Act, because the full lawmaking process still applies and dynamic regulation only supplements and optimizes the existing rulemaking process.

**Type.** design  **Support.** argued

**Holds when.**

- United States administrative law under the APA

**Source quote.**

> Dynamic regulatory supplements would not violate mandated regulatory procedures in the APA135 as the full lawmaking process still applies.136 Dynamic regulation functions as a regulatory supplement to help optimize the existing rulemaking process.

**From.** Wulf A. Kaal, Erik P.M. Vermeulen, *Venture Capital as Dynamic Regulation of Disruptive Innovation* (2016), V. Dynamic Regulation as a Regulatory Supplement, page 26

**Cite as.** Wulf A. Kaal, Erik P.M. Vermeulen, Venture Capital as Dynamic Regulation of Disruptive Innovation (2016). SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2740477

**Verify.** sha256 of source PDF `c72871b76fa2ad5a8a69ee8d3defc8f64e624be9052ce763e79cf6c58883f726` at https://raw.githubusercontent.com/wulfkaal/Academic-Papers/main/papers/pdf/Kaal%20and%20Vermeulen%20-%202016%20-%20Venture%20Capital%20as%20Dynamic%20Regulation%20of%20Disruptive%20Innovation.pdf

**Topics.** dynamic-regulation, law-and-legal-systems

**Keywords.** administrative-procedure-act, dynamic-regulation, regulatory-supplement, legal-compatibility

**Related claims.**

- restated_by: https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/2808132-036

**Canonical form.** This markdown file is the canonical hashed representation of the claim. Its sha256 is the content hash used for attestation.