# kaal:claim:2808132-013

**Claim.** The existing regulatory infrastructure cannot sufficiently distinguish beneficial innovation from harmful innovation and therefore cannot harness the beneficial kind.

**Type.** failure  **Support.** asserted

**Holds when.**

- existing regulatory infrastructure without dynamic or anticipatory elements

**Source quote.**

> The existing regulatory infrastructure cannot sufficiently distinguish and harness beneficial innovation. Rulemakers' inability to address regulatory issues associated with

**From.** Wulf A. Kaal, Erik P.M. Vermeulen, *How to Regulate Disruptive Innovation - From Facts to Data* (2016), III. Disruptive Innovation as a Regulatory Challenge, page 17

**Cite as.** Wulf A. Kaal, Erik P.M. Vermeulen, How to Regulate Disruptive Innovation - From Facts to Data (2016). SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2808132

**Verify.** sha256 of source PDF `3515f2317ed9c1d33ae55d70467cdf1f6c4e350065ea6a887d5d7619599ad7d2` at https://raw.githubusercontent.com/wulfkaal/Academic-Papers/main/papers/pdf/Kaal%20and%20Vermeulen%20-%202016%20-%20How%20to%20Regulate%20Disruptive%20Innovation%20-%20From%20Facts%20to%20Data.pdf

**Failure mode.** Inability to identify beneficial innovation  (family: regulatory-lag)

**Topics.** regulatory-failure, innovation

**Keywords.** regulatory-failure, beneficial-innovation, regulatory-infrastructure, disruptive-innovation

**Related claims.**

- restated_by: https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/2834531-008

**Canonical form.** This markdown file is the canonical hashed representation of the claim. Its sha256 is the content hash used for attestation.