# kaal:claim:2808132-015

**Claim.** The current regulatory framework lacks any mechanism that anticipatorily informs rulemakers of beneficial innovative ideas, and because the rulemaking process prohibits ex parte communications and integrates cross-industry brainstorming poorly, the process may actually undermine innovation.

**Type.** failure  **Support.** argued

**Holds when.**

- notice and comment rulemaking under the existing administrative framework

**Source quote.**

> informs rulemakers of beneficial innovative ideas. In fact, the existing rulemaking process prohibits ex parte communications and insufficiently integrates brainstorming and ideas across industries, and therefore may actually undermine innovation.

**From.** Wulf A. Kaal, Erik P.M. Vermeulen, *How to Regulate Disruptive Innovation - From Facts to Data* (2016), III. Disruptive Innovation as a Regulatory Challenge, page 18

**Cite as.** Wulf A. Kaal, Erik P.M. Vermeulen, How to Regulate Disruptive Innovation - From Facts to Data (2016). SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2808132

**Verify.** sha256 of source PDF `3515f2317ed9c1d33ae55d70467cdf1f6c4e350065ea6a887d5d7619599ad7d2` at https://raw.githubusercontent.com/wulfkaal/Academic-Papers/main/papers/pdf/Kaal%20and%20Vermeulen%20-%202016%20-%20How%20to%20Regulate%20Disruptive%20Innovation%20-%20From%20Facts%20to%20Data.pdf

**Failure mode.** Ex parte prohibition information blockade  (family: regulatory-lag)

**Topics.** innovation, dynamic-regulation, regulatory-failure

**Keywords.** ex-parte-communications, notice-and-comment, innovation-chilling, rulemaking-design, regulatory-failure

**Related claims.**

- extends: https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/2740477-015
- extends: https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/2740477-014
- restated_by: https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/2834531-010

**Canonical form.** This markdown file is the canonical hashed representation of the claim. Its sha256 is the content hash used for attestation.