# kaal:claim:2808132-017

**Claim.** Because facts-based rulemaking does not anticipate the regulatory issues created by innovation, rulemakers may realize far too late, or never, what new regulatory demands a given innovation generates.

**Type.** failure  **Support.** argued

**Holds when.**

- age of exponential innovation
- purely reactive facts-based rulemaking

**Source quote.**

> facts-based rulemaking did not anticipate regulatory issues created by innovation, rulemakers may not at all or much too late realize what new regulatory demands apply to a given innovation and associated regulatory issue.

**From.** Wulf A. Kaal, Erik P.M. Vermeulen, *How to Regulate Disruptive Innovation - From Facts to Data* (2016), III.1 Ex Post Facts-Based (Trial-and-Error) Rulemaking, page 18

**Cite as.** Wulf A. Kaal, Erik P.M. Vermeulen, How to Regulate Disruptive Innovation - From Facts to Data (2016). SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2808132

**Verify.** sha256 of source PDF `3515f2317ed9c1d33ae55d70467cdf1f6c4e350065ea6a887d5d7619599ad7d2` at https://raw.githubusercontent.com/wulfkaal/Academic-Papers/main/papers/pdf/Kaal%20and%20Vermeulen%20-%202016%20-%20How%20to%20Regulate%20Disruptive%20Innovation%20-%20From%20Facts%20to%20Data.pdf

**Failure mode.** Late or absent recognition of regulatory need  (family: regulatory-lag)

**Topics.** dynamic-regulation, regulatory-failure

**Keywords.** ex-post-rulemaking, regulatory-lag, anticipatory-rulemaking, regulatory-failure

**Related claims.**

- restated_by: https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/2957645-002
- restated_by: https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/2831040-007

**Canonical form.** This markdown file is the canonical hashed representation of the claim. Its sha256 is the content hash used for attestation.
