# kaal:claim:2808132-019

**Claim.** Because rulemakers are increasingly unlikely to be able to protect the public through stable and presumptively optimal rules alone, regulatory supplements that enable anticipatory rulemaking become justified.

**Type.** condition  **Support.** argued

**Holds when.**

- exponential growth of technology and associated complexity of regulatory issues
- rulemakers unable to adequately protect constituents

**Source quote.**

> rulemakers will be able to effectively protect the public via stable and presumptively optimal rules. If rulemakers cannot adequately protect their constituents, regulatory supplements facilitating anticipatory rulemaking may be justified.

**From.** Wulf A. Kaal, Erik P.M. Vermeulen, *How to Regulate Disruptive Innovation - From Facts to Data* (2016), III.2 Stable and Presumptively Optimal Rules, page 19

**Cite as.** Wulf A. Kaal, Erik P.M. Vermeulen, How to Regulate Disruptive Innovation - From Facts to Data (2016). SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2808132

**Verify.** sha256 of source PDF `3515f2317ed9c1d33ae55d70467cdf1f6c4e350065ea6a887d5d7619599ad7d2` at https://raw.githubusercontent.com/wulfkaal/Academic-Papers/main/papers/pdf/Kaal%20and%20Vermeulen%20-%202016%20-%20How%20to%20Regulate%20Disruptive%20Innovation%20-%20From%20Facts%20to%20Data.pdf

**Topics.** dynamic-regulation

**Keywords.** regulatory-supplement, anticipatory-rulemaking, stable-rules, justification

**Related claims.**

- restates: https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/2740477-018
- supports: https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/2273857-043
- extends: https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/2267560-025

**Canonical form.** This markdown file is the canonical hashed representation of the claim. Its sha256 is the content hash used for attestation.