# kaal:claim:2808132-024

**Claim.** Because it lacks anticipatory capabilities, the existing regulatory system only addresses regulatory issues ex post, and then only if core constituents are burdened enough to generate sufficient political pressure for lawmakers to act.

**Type.** mechanism  **Support.** argued

**Holds when.**

- existing regulatory infrastructure built on stable and presumptively optimal rules

**Source quote.**

> associated with disruptive innovation. Because it lacks anticipatory rulemaking capabilities, the existing regulatory system addresses regulatory issues only ex-post, if and when they materialize and if core constituents are sufficiently burdened to precipitate

**From.** Wulf A. Kaal, Erik P.M. Vermeulen, *How to Regulate Disruptive Innovation - From Facts to Data* (2016), III.4 Unknown Future Contingencies, page 21

**Cite as.** Wulf A. Kaal, Erik P.M. Vermeulen, How to Regulate Disruptive Innovation - From Facts to Data (2016). SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2808132

**Verify.** sha256 of source PDF `3515f2317ed9c1d33ae55d70467cdf1f6c4e350065ea6a887d5d7619599ad7d2` at https://raw.githubusercontent.com/wulfkaal/Academic-Papers/main/papers/pdf/Kaal%20and%20Vermeulen%20-%202016%20-%20How%20to%20Regulate%20Disruptive%20Innovation%20-%20From%20Facts%20to%20Data.pdf

**Failure mode.** Political pressure trigger requirement  (family: regulatory-lag)

**Topics.** dynamic-regulation, regulatory-failure

**Keywords.** ex-post-rulemaking, political-pressure, unknown-contingencies, regulatory-failure

**Related claims.**

- restates: https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/2740477-022

**Canonical form.** This markdown file is the canonical hashed representation of the claim. Its sha256 is the content hash used for attestation.