# kaal:claim:2808132-030

**Claim.** Regulatory cycles and trial-and-error rulemaking become less prevalent under adaptive rulemaking because adaptive capabilities supplement stable rules, making rule revisions less frequent.

**Type.** mechanism  **Support.** argued

**Holds when.**

- rulemaking processes supplemented with adaptive capabilities

**Source quote.**

> Similarly, regulatory cycles and trial-and-error rulemaking become less prevalent because adaptive rulemaking processes supplement stable rules with adaptive capabilities that make rule revisions less prevalent and minimize trial-and error rulemaking.

**From.** Wulf A. Kaal, Erik P.M. Vermeulen, *How to Regulate Disruptive Innovation - From Facts to Data* (2016), IV. Dynamic Regulation as a Regulatory Supplement, page 23

**Cite as.** Wulf A. Kaal, Erik P.M. Vermeulen, How to Regulate Disruptive Innovation - From Facts to Data (2016). SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2808132

**Verify.** sha256 of source PDF `3515f2317ed9c1d33ae55d70467cdf1f6c4e350065ea6a887d5d7619599ad7d2` at https://raw.githubusercontent.com/wulfkaal/Academic-Papers/main/papers/pdf/Kaal%20and%20Vermeulen%20-%202016%20-%20How%20to%20Regulate%20Disruptive%20Innovation%20-%20From%20Facts%20to%20Data.pdf

**Topics.** dynamic-regulation

**Keywords.** adaptive-rulemaking, regulatory-cycles, trial-and-error, dynamic-regulation

**Related claims.**

- restates: https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/kaal-2014-dynamicregulationviagove-018

**Canonical form.** This markdown file is the canonical hashed representation of the claim. Its sha256 is the content hash used for attestation.