# kaal:claim:2808132-036

**Claim.** Dynamic regulatory supplements would not violate the procedural mandates of the Administrative Procedure Act, because the full lawmaking process still applies; dynamic regulation supplements rather than replaces the existing rulemaking process.

**Type.** design  **Support.** argued

**Holds when.**

- United States administrative law under the Administrative Procedure Act

**Source quote.**

> Dynamic regulatory supplements would not violate mandated regulatory procedures in the APA126 as the full lawmaking process still applies.127 Dynamic regulation functions as a regulatory supplement to help optimize the existing rulemaking process.

**From.** Wulf A. Kaal, Erik P.M. Vermeulen, *How to Regulate Disruptive Innovation - From Facts to Data* (2016), IV. Dynamic Regulation as a Regulatory Supplement, page 25

**Cite as.** Wulf A. Kaal, Erik P.M. Vermeulen, How to Regulate Disruptive Innovation - From Facts to Data (2016). SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2808132

**Verify.** sha256 of source PDF `3515f2317ed9c1d33ae55d70467cdf1f6c4e350065ea6a887d5d7619599ad7d2` at https://raw.githubusercontent.com/wulfkaal/Academic-Papers/main/papers/pdf/Kaal%20and%20Vermeulen%20-%202016%20-%20How%20to%20Regulate%20Disruptive%20Innovation%20-%20From%20Facts%20to%20Data.pdf

**Topics.** dynamic-regulation, law-and-legal-systems

**Keywords.** administrative-procedure-act, dynamic-regulation, regulatory-supplement, legal-feasibility

**Related claims.**

- restates: https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/2740477-033

**Canonical form.** This markdown file is the canonical hashed representation of the claim. Its sha256 is the content hash used for attestation.