# kaal:claim:2808132-048

**Claim.** Regulators should take anticipatory measures only after cross-validation and triangulation, that is, when multiple independent data analyses point unanimously toward a specific demand for regulatory action.

**Type.** design  **Support.** argued

**Holds when.**

- multiple high-quality decentralized real-time data sources available to regulators
- unanimous convergence of those analyses

**Source quote.**

> high-quality, decentralized, and real-time information for rulemaking. If and when multiple data analyses together point unanimously in the direction of a certain demand for regulatory action, regulators should take anticipatory measures after cross-validation

**From.** Wulf A. Kaal, Erik P.M. Vermeulen, *How to Regulate Disruptive Innovation - From Facts to Data* (2016), VI. Venture Capital as Dynamic Regulation of Disruptive Innovation, page 39

**Cite as.** Wulf A. Kaal, Erik P.M. Vermeulen, How to Regulate Disruptive Innovation - From Facts to Data (2016). SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2808132

**Verify.** sha256 of source PDF `3515f2317ed9c1d33ae55d70467cdf1f6c4e350065ea6a887d5d7619599ad7d2` at https://raw.githubusercontent.com/wulfkaal/Academic-Papers/main/papers/pdf/Kaal%20and%20Vermeulen%20-%202016%20-%20How%20to%20Regulate%20Disruptive%20Innovation%20-%20From%20Facts%20to%20Data.pdf

**Topics.** dynamic-regulation

**Keywords.** cross-validation, triangulation, anticipatory-rulemaking, regulatory-design, data-driven-regulation

**Canonical form.** This markdown file is the canonical hashed representation of the claim. Its sha256 is the content hash used for attestation.