# kaal:claim:2808132-049

**Claim.** No regulatory processes or data evaluation capabilities currently exist that could carry out the cross-validated analyses and support the anticipatory regulatory action the authors propose.

**Type.** failure  **Support.** asserted

**Holds when.**

- as of 2016 in the United States regulatory system

**Source quote.**

> and triangulation. Currently no regulatory processes and data evaluation exist that could facilitate such analyses and anticipatory regulatory action.

**From.** Wulf A. Kaal, Erik P.M. Vermeulen, *How to Regulate Disruptive Innovation - From Facts to Data* (2016), VI. Venture Capital as Dynamic Regulation of Disruptive Innovation, page 39

**Cite as.** Wulf A. Kaal, Erik P.M. Vermeulen, How to Regulate Disruptive Innovation - From Facts to Data (2016). SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2808132

**Verify.** sha256 of source PDF `3515f2317ed9c1d33ae55d70467cdf1f6c4e350065ea6a887d5d7619599ad7d2` at https://raw.githubusercontent.com/wulfkaal/Academic-Papers/main/papers/pdf/Kaal%20and%20Vermeulen%20-%202016%20-%20How%20to%20Regulate%20Disruptive%20Innovation%20-%20From%20Facts%20to%20Data.pdf

**Failure mode.** Absent institutional capacity for data-driven anticipation  (family: supervisory-capacity-gap)

**Topics.** institutional-design, dynamic-regulation

**Keywords.** institutional-gap, data-driven-regulation, anticipatory-rulemaking, regulatory-capacity

**Canonical form.** This markdown file is the canonical hashed representation of the claim. Its sha256 is the content hash used for attestation.