# kaal:claim:2811718-014

**Claim.** Litigation research on private fund due diligence requires in depth evaluation of case dockets rather than only published judicial decisions, because opinions are snapshots that do not tell the whole story of a case.

**Type.** design  **Support.** argued

**Holds when.**

- empirical legal research on litigation records

**Source quote.**

> Litigation research requires an in-depth evaluation of case dockets rather than published judicial decisions.

**From.** Wulf A. Kaal, *Private Fund Investor Due Diligence – Evidence from 1995 to 2015* (2016), III.B. Litigation Record: 1995 to 2015, page 25

**Cite as.** Wulf A. Kaal, Private Fund Investor Due Diligence – Evidence from 1995 to 2015 (2016). SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2811718

**Verify.** sha256 of source PDF `b52152af561288173840a1cabbcf8f4b337e73507c856ee01600799073f4156f` at https://raw.githubusercontent.com/wulfkaal/Academic-Papers/main/papers/pdf/Kaal%20-%202016%20-%20Private%20Fund%20Investor%20Due%20Diligence%20%E2%80%93%20Evidence%20from%201995%20to%202015.pdf

**Topics.** law-and-legal-systems, empirical-evidence, research-methods

**Keywords.** empirical-legal-studies, dockets, methodology, case-law

**Canonical form.** This markdown file is the canonical hashed representation of the claim. Its sha256 is the content hash used for attestation.