# kaal:claim:2811718-038

**Claim.** Private fund investor due diligence may follow the evolutionary path of bank risk evaluation, which fifteen years ago operated without uniformity or applicable standards and is today heavily regulated and has evolved into a science.

**Type.** predictive  **Support.** speculative

**Holds when.**

- by analogy to bank risk evaluation
- if standardization pressure continues

**Source quote.**

> In analogy to banks' risk evaluation, fifteen years ago banks operated with general risk evaluation strategies but no uniformity and no applicable standards, whereas today banks' risk evaluation is heavily regulated and has evolved into a science. Private fund IDD may follow the same evolution.

**From.** Wulf A. Kaal, *Private Fund Investor Due Diligence – Evidence from 1995 to 2015* (2016), IV. Discussion, page 60

**Cite as.** Wulf A. Kaal, Private Fund Investor Due Diligence – Evidence from 1995 to 2015 (2016). SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2811718

**Verify.** sha256 of source PDF `b52152af561288173840a1cabbcf8f4b337e73507c856ee01600799073f4156f` at https://raw.githubusercontent.com/wulfkaal/Academic-Papers/main/papers/pdf/Kaal%20-%202016%20-%20Private%20Fund%20Investor%20Due%20Diligence%20%E2%80%93%20Evidence%20from%201995%20to%202015.pdf

**Topics.** systemic-risk, risk-and-incentives

**Keywords.** standardization, prediction, bank-risk-management, regulation

**Related claims.**

- restated_by: https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/2998097-032

**Canonical form.** This markdown file is the canonical hashed representation of the claim. Its sha256 is the content hash used for attestation.