# kaal:claim:2831040-004

**Claim.** Systemic factors widen the divergence between regulation and innovation, including the political and ideological structures of the rulemaking process and the political gridlock of a two party system that impedes the passing of legislation.

**Type.** mechanism  **Support.** argued

**Holds when.**

- two party legislative systems

**Source quote.**

> Such factors include the political and ideological structures in the rulemaking process, the political gridlock in a two-party system that impedes the passing of legislation

**From.** Wulf A. Kaal, *Dynamic Regulation for Innovation* (2016), II. Law's Diminishing Capacity to React to Innovation, page 8

**Cite as.** Wulf A. Kaal, Dynamic Regulation for Innovation (2016). SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2831040

**Verify.** sha256 of source PDF `de5156f14f44a5753cab55b6c4b03049eda58a143b99e08ef427aee1d261e1bf` at https://raw.githubusercontent.com/wulfkaal/Academic-Papers/main/papers/pdf/Kaal%20-%202016%20-%20Dynamic%20Regulation%20for%20Innovation.pdf

**Failure mode.** political gridlock in rulemaking  (family: regulatory-lag)

**Topics.** institutional-design

**Keywords.** political-gridlock, legislative-process, crisis-driven-regulation, pacing-problem

**Canonical form.** This markdown file is the canonical hashed representation of the claim. Its sha256 is the content hash used for attestation.