# kaal:claim:2831040-005

**Claim.** The most widely recognized drawbacks of traditional rulemaking under the Administrative Procedure Act are its lack of speed, its cumbersomeness, and the volume of litigation generated by its notice and comment procedures.

**Type.** failure  **Support.** argued

**Holds when.**

- United States APA notice and comment rulemaking

**Source quote.**

> The most traditional and widely recognized drawbacks of the traditional rulemaking system under the Administrative Procedure Act (APA) include its lacking speed, cumbersomeness, and the quantity of litigation it generates via its notice and comment procedures

**From.** Wulf A. Kaal, *Dynamic Regulation for Innovation* (2016), II. Law's Diminishing Capacity to React to Innovation, page 9

**Cite as.** Wulf A. Kaal, Dynamic Regulation for Innovation (2016). SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2831040

**Verify.** sha256 of source PDF `de5156f14f44a5753cab55b6c4b03049eda58a143b99e08ef427aee1d261e1bf` at https://raw.githubusercontent.com/wulfkaal/Academic-Papers/main/papers/pdf/Kaal%20-%202016%20-%20Dynamic%20Regulation%20for%20Innovation.pdf

**Failure mode.** APA rulemaking drag  (family: regulatory-lag)

**Topics.** dynamic-regulation, law-and-legal-systems

**Keywords.** administrative-procedure-act, notice-and-comment, rulemaking-speed, litigation

**Related claims.**

- restates: https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/2740477-040

**Canonical form.** This markdown file is the canonical hashed representation of the claim. Its sha256 is the content hash used for attestation.