# kaal:claim:2831040-015

**Claim.** The three core law and technology proposals for the pacing problem, regulation via the judiciary, early stage regulation of innovation, and principles based regulation, all have practical limitations and none of them uses dynamic regulatory elements.

**Type.** failure  **Support.** argued

**Source quote.**

> None of these proposals uses dynamic regulatory elements. By contrast, dynamic regulation emphasizes dynamic elements in regulating innovation.

**From.** Wulf A. Kaal, *Dynamic Regulation for Innovation* (2016), I. Introduction, page 7

**Cite as.** Wulf A. Kaal, Dynamic Regulation for Innovation (2016). SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2831040

**Verify.** sha256 of source PDF `de5156f14f44a5753cab55b6c4b03049eda58a143b99e08ef427aee1d261e1bf` at https://raw.githubusercontent.com/wulfkaal/Academic-Papers/main/papers/pdf/Kaal%20-%202016%20-%20Dynamic%20Regulation%20for%20Innovation.pdf

**Failure mode.** static remedies for a dynamic problem  (family: regulatory-lag)

**Topics.** dynamic-regulation

**Keywords.** pacing-problem, remedies, judiciary, principles-based-regulation, dynamic-regulation

**Related claims.**

- supported_by: https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/2834531-040

**Canonical form.** This markdown file is the canonical hashed representation of the claim. Its sha256 is the content hash used for attestation.