# kaal:claim:2831040-016

**Claim.** Addressing the regulatory issues created by innovation outpacing law through the judiciary is insufficient in the face of exponential innovation, because increasing evidence shows courts cannot sufficiently counterbalance the shortcomings of the legislative system.

**Type.** failure  **Support.** argued

**Holds when.**

- exponential innovation

**Source quote.**

> Addressing the regulatory issues associated with innovation outpacing law via the judiciary is insufficient in the face of exponential innovation.

**From.** Wulf A. Kaal, *Dynamic Regulation for Innovation* (2016), IV.1 Remedying the Pacing Problem, page 15

**Cite as.** Wulf A. Kaal, Dynamic Regulation for Innovation (2016). SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2831040

**Verify.** sha256 of source PDF `de5156f14f44a5753cab55b6c4b03049eda58a143b99e08ef427aee1d261e1bf` at https://raw.githubusercontent.com/wulfkaal/Academic-Papers/main/papers/pdf/Kaal%20-%202016%20-%20Dynamic%20Regulation%20for%20Innovation.pdf

**Failure mode.** judicial remedy insufficiency  (family: regulatory-lag)

**Topics.** law-and-legal-systems

**Keywords.** judiciary, courts, pacing-problem, regulatory-remedies

**Canonical form.** This markdown file is the canonical hashed representation of the claim. Its sha256 is the content hash used for attestation.