# kaal:claim:2834531-037

**Claim.** Regulatory experimentation matters within a single jurisdiction and not only across jurisdictions, because it gives regulators data on the real world effects of a particular regulatory scheme in a comparable setting.

**Type.** design  **Support.** argued

**Holds when.**

- comparable settings within one jurisdiction

**Source quote.**

> But such experimentation is also important within a particular jurisdiction as it provides regulators with data on the real–world effects of a particular regulatory scheme in a comparable setting.

**From.** Mark Fenwick, Wulf A. Kaal, Erik P. M. Vermeulen, *Regulation Tomorrow What Happens When Technology Is Faster Than the Law* (2017), B. A Principle-Based Approach, page 29

**Cite as.** Mark Fenwick, Wulf A. Kaal, Erik P. M. Vermeulen, Regulation Tomorrow What Happens When Technology Is Faster Than the Law (2017). SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2834531

**Verify.** sha256 of source PDF `9cd875ebdb0266febbdcdabfca5b9b9f0de1b7ad9e3d5a8a5971bdbe469323b7` at https://raw.githubusercontent.com/wulfkaal/Academic-Papers/main/papers/pdf/Fenwick%20et%20al.%20-%202017%20-%20Regulation%20Tomorrow%20What%20Happens%20When%20Technology%20Is%20Faster%20Than%20the%20Law.pdf

**Topics.** economics, empirical-evidence, dynamic-regulation

**Keywords.** regulatory-experimentation, regulatory-competition, evidence-base, regulatory-design

**Related claims.**

- extends: https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/2273857-051

**Canonical form.** This markdown file is the canonical hashed representation of the claim. Its sha256 is the content hash used for attestation.